Celebrating the 155th birth anniversary of Mahatma Gandhi

 

Celebrating the 155th birth anniversary of Mahatma Gandhi

Need to revisit Mahatma Gandhi’s philosophy of human interdependence for sustainability

I believe in advaita, I believe in the essential unity of man and, for that matter, of all that life's. Therefore, I believe that if one man gains spiritually, the whole world gains with him and, if one man falls, the whole world falls to that extent. – Mahatma Gandhi (Young India, 4-12-1924).

Mahatma Gandhi’s ahimsa was rooted in the philosophy of human interdependence which entailed the intrinsic link between human-nature- and all other living beings. This idea of human interdependence is important today given the environmental degradation and climate change issues we are witnessing around the world. Also the idea of human interdependence is important to assimilate to counter inequalities and fragmentation of our societies. To explore these principles and as a tribute to Mahatma Gandhi on his 155th birth anniversary, Munazah Shah (senior broadcast journalist) and Vedabhyas Kundu (expert in nonviolent communication) interview Kumar Kalanand Mani, a veteran Gandhian and a noted environmental activist from Goa. He had a background of nine years active full-time involvement in the Sarvodaya – Bhoodan Movement in Bihar and then as a fully committed participant in the JP movement and the Chhatra Sangharsha Samiti from 1974.

Munazah Shah: Sir, given the criticality of environmental concerns today, please share the importance of Gandhian vision of human interdependence and how is it important today?

Kumar Kalanan Mani: In the era of population burst, mindless consumption, growing disparity and violence or volatile social and environmental atmosphere, Mahatma Gandhi's own life-messages have become extremely relevant as answer to almost all issues human and nature confronting today. The environment, economy and social mirage find answers in non-violent forms of living having perfect synergy between nature and existence of all forms of life on the earth. Munazah and Vedabhyas, I tell you we have to work incessantly keeping in mind the principles of satya and ahimsa to counter the concerns of environment or other problems confronting us. Also of course the foundation has to be the philosophy of human interdependence. On the importance of truth, let us remind ourselves of these apt quote of the Mahatma, “All our activity should be centered in Truth. Truth should be the very breath of our life. When once this stage in the pilgrim's progress is reached, all other rules of correct living will come without effort, and obedience to them will be instinctive. But without Truth it is impossible to observe any principles or rules in life.” (From Yeravda Mandir).

Vedabhyas Kundu: Sir, linked to the question by Munazah, how can the Gandhian philosophy of trusteeship help greater understanding of our approach to resource management and environmental sustainability in the context of global climate change?

Kumar Kalanan Mani: The growing monopoly by the few over all forms of resources including natural and human, both are the main cause of exploitation, disparity and disharmony. Mahatma Gandhi advocated for the equal partnership between labour and capital. One may have better skills for amassing wealth, but as per Gandhiji it must be used for social well being. Monopolization of the wealth leads to unregulated, uncontrolled and irresponsible exploitation and lawlessness. Therefore whether corporate owned economic activities or government owned, its sole objectives should be all-round welfare the people without harming the natural resources.

Gandhi's trusteeship welcomes individuals for making wealth because of their ability to do so, with two objectives while making the wealth, first use it for meeting their own need and second to use the wealth largely for social wellbeing. The wealth creation should be done solely with social purposes. Here let us remember Bapu and his idea of trusteeship, “My theory of ‘trusteeship’ is no make-shift, certainly no camouflage. I am confident that it will survive all other theories. It has the sanction of philosophy and religion behind it. That possessors of wealth have not acted up to the theory does not prove its falsity; it proves the weakness of the wealthy. No other theory is compatible with non-violence. In the non-violent method wrong-doer compasses his own end, if he does not undo the wrong. For, either through non-violent non-co-operation he is made to see the error, or he finds himself completely isolated.” (Harijan, 16-12-1939).

Munazah Shah: What role does the Gandhian values of compassion and service play in fostering social cohesion and addressing issues of inequalities in an increasingly fragmented society?

Kumar Kalanan Mani: Kindly recall why the civil disobedience movement was withdrawn despite the fact that agitators had killed the policemen of the colonial government? Why was Charkha and Khadi propagated as one of the key activities since 1920 and why removal of untouchability was a main programme for achieving and sustaining the Swarajya? Besides rejecting methods of violence to achieve swarajya, unity and cooperation among Hindu and Muslim remained the focal programme of Gandhiji led struggle for India's freedom. Compassion is one of the core values of civilised, equal human society which wins over the negative values like exploitation, hate and violence. Therefore he wrote to Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru that we would have left with no option except leading violent acts in different parts of the country if we failed to reject it now. He in another confession, lauded that I am not fighting only for the independence of India, but through India's independence, trying to make the whole world non-violent. Non-violence can't become eternal, spiritual values in the absence of compassion which is the uniqueness of the human-life. Gandhiji respected the diversity of leading human life, be it religion, race, gender, class and culture. Therefore he said that "My Life is My Message". His life-messages lie in 18 Constructive Programmes, 11 vows and seven social sins.

Vedabhyas Kundu: Sir, how do you think the Gandhian concept of truthfulness can serve the foundation for building trust in today’s society? This is more critical in the backdrop of widespread misinformation and disinformation?

Kumar Kalanand Mani: The widespread misinformation today is primarily an act of denial of the truth. The truth is always based on authentic evidence and the human's own sincere attempt to be equipped with good humanitarian values. This also requires that we win-over the negative, harmful attitude of hate, envy, aggression and arrogance.

Munazah Shah and Vedabhyas Kundu: Sir, how do you think the Mahatma’s ahimsa help counter contemporary conflicts- whether in communities or at the global level?

Kumar Kalanan Mani: I have no doubt that the world today is afraid of clouds of violence and there is a big search for the peaceful-coexistence. In such search Mahatma Gandhi is their first shelter to move together of a globalised world free from war, exploitation, domination and make it a loving planet to live with each-one's co-operation and sacrifice.

How toxic and taxing work culture throttles humanity in organizations?

How toxic and taxing work culture throttles humanity in organizations?

The recent death of an Ernst & Young (EY) employee, Anna Sebastian Perayil, 26 due to extreme and grueling work pressure has once again stirred the hornet’s nest on the toxic and taxing work culture in different organizations and companies. Anna was working as a chartered accountant with S R Batliboi, which is a member firm of EY Global in Pune, Maharastra. According to different news reports, the National Human Rights Commission has asked organizations to review their work culture so as to ensure alignment with global human rights standards.

While the unfortunate demise of Anna is an example of extreme and toxic work place culture where no values are given to individuals and their lives while there tends to be glorification of over-work and achievement of targets at any cost, a very large number of individuals express deep concern at the lack of initiatives to improve work place cultures.

According to Sayantani Roy, Assistant Director, Rajendra Prasad Institute of Communication and Management, Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan, many of her students who are placed in different companies complain of poor working environment where there is not only poor value given to individual’s dignity, but the thrust is on over-work and even unethical practices. “Has our workplaces lost their humanity?” she quips and talks about the existential dilemma of many young people, “You quit one job because of toxic work environment, but there is a possibility that you may land in a worse place!”

Roy explains the unfortunate case of Anna or others who may end up becoming mental wreck due to toxic work cultures is not due to organizations themselves but the individuals or small groups within them. Such individuals, according to her start acting as if they own everything and everyone in the organization, even daring to freely manipulating others according to their whims and fancies. They promote bitter and bad politics so that their stranglehold remains and continue their own and their inner circles elevation, she points out.

While arguing on the need to promote a more compassionate and balanced work culture in organizations, Prof K V Nagaraj, former pro-vice chancellor of Assam Central University, underlines that it is all about encouraging deeper human connections and not superficial engagements in organizations. He argues that all the humbug about 14-hour work culture with enhanced productivity is totally gibberish; in reality the human body cannot take such long hours of pain and work load. In fact, it declines productivity and innovativeness, he stresses pointing out that human brain will not be able to register properly the work beyond 8-9 hours.

“This is why increasingly we find young people developing heart problems, other lifestyle diseases like diabetes, sleeping disorders, depression, etc.” Prof Nagaraj points out, “Mental ailments is becoming a major life threatening issue in contemporary times due to pathetic work conditions where individuals are not treated as human beings.” For him the mantra to get over with such grim work place condition should be to give mental and physical health greater priority than work. It should not only be an employees’ priority but also be ingrained in the DNA of organizations, otherwise we will keep having unfortunate incidents like that of Anna, he underlines.

Also both at the individual and organizational level, there should be introduction to mindfulness practices along with other avenues to de-stress. Prof Nagaraj also advocates on the need to use the strategies and tools of nonviolent communication in organizational communication ecosystems so that it helps in the evolution of a harmonious work environment. Ensuring psychological and physical safety of employees has to be the top priority of employees, he stresses.

“We have to reclaim the spirit of humanism and human values in our institutions and companies,” this was Prof Nagaraj’s singular call to organizations across the country.

Meanwhile Rajaram (name changed on request) who works in an organization where he says is now bereft of human values, sharing his own experience laments at the fact that overworking is often glorified as ambition or dedication, while employees who prioritize mental and physical health are seen as lacking commitment.

“This dehumanizing approach turns employees into mere assets, forcing them to deliver results at the expense of their health and well-being. Such a system, where profits are valued more than people, pushes individuals to the brink, creating a workforce that is unhealthy and unsustainable,” Rajaram contends.

Unfortunate incidents like Anna’s death is a warning signal that it’s time for organizations to recognize that their true assets are their people, not their profits. Rajaram elaborates on what needs to be done, “Workplaces must prioritize mental health, encourage open conversations about stress, and foster compassionate leadership. The tragic loss of these young professionals serves as a wake-up call. We must stop glorifying overwork and start advocating for a healthier, more humane approach to success—because no job is worth dying for. “

Swabhav Swachhata-Sanskaar Swachhata

Swabhav swachhata-sanskaar swachhata (purity and cleanliness in behaviour and culture) is the theme of this year’s swachhata his seva campaign of the Government of India. As a tribute to the Father of the Nation, Mahatma Gandhi, the Government of India has been promoting a swachhata hi seva campaign every year. The aim of this campaign has been to motivate people across the country to come together and develop a citizen’s movement for sanitation and cleanliness (swachhata). This year the campaign starts from September 17 to October 2 (the birth anniversary of Mahatma Gandhi).

The initiative to make India completely and holistically clean was launched by the Prime Minister Narendra Modi on August 15, 2014 when in his Independence speech from the ramparts of Red Fort he gave a clarion call to make swachhata a national priority. This effort to make sanitation and cleanliness a national mission can only be achieved through people’s participation, the Prime Minister had underlined. Ever since then as a run up to October 2 (Gandhi Jayanti), the swachhata hi seva campaign is taken up.

The aim to make swachhata an intrinsic part of the lives of the citizens of the country resonates with large number of people who see it as something which is directly linked to their well-being and happiness. While there are individuals who point out that swachhata has always been part of their tradition and culture, but this special campaign is helping in promoting greater awareness and highlighting the holistic nature of swachhata.

Talking of the theme of this year’s campaign, Divya Gyan, an advocate argues that cleanliness outside can only come as a product of cleanliness inside. He underlines, “Inner swachhta is the cornerstone of human development and any development, scientific or otherwise, can only come if humans first decide to embrace their own soul and work towards cleaning it.”

According to Gyan, “The first step of developing a society is to first improve yourself. Society is but a bigger picture of human structure, if we as small units first improve ourselves, the tapestry is sure to improve.” Without self-cleansing and self-purification, we can neither transform ourselves nor transform the society.

Divya Gyan describes how the theme of this year’s campaign reminds him of what Kabir said “bura jo Dekhan mai Chala, mujhse bura nai koi”. The process to first identify a shortcoming, still less working for it, is a gigantic task which requires great human effort and character, he stresses.

Meanwhile Manya Dudeja, a fifth year law student points out, “An anecdote which has often worked for me personally when I'm buried in work commitments is to tidy up my workspace.” She feels this has significant impact on her as it clears up her mind for any task she has at hand. It creates an illusion of structure and makes me trust that I've got this, she adds.

According to Manya, the first step towards making an outward effort to put things in place, to make the world a better place and to undo the outside dirt, is the effort towards moral cleanliness. One’s heart and head must be clean, she says so that we can strive for cleanliness outside.

Manya emphasizes that the transformation and change has to begin from within and we have to turn inwards for the inner cleansing. She underscores, “To strive for cleanliness (ethical and professional) outside, one must first strive for cleanliness within and this is only possible through our constant efforts. Some of the ways one might attain inner cleanliness is self-care activities, instilling a disciplined lifestyle and creating an emotional balance.”

Gunjan Saxena of Dev’s Handicrafts argues that cleanliness in one’s attitude and behaviour can be promoted by adopting eco-friendly and sustainable lifestyle. This can lead to inner calmness and a propensity to adopt clean habits and behaviour, both at the inner and outer level, she stresses. “We must make it a habit to use natural and environmental-friendly products so that it aligns with our behaviour and attitude which should be nonviolent in nature,” Saxena notes. She has been conducting workshops in these areas to create greater awareness.

According to Saxena, if we use products which are harmful to nature, we are promoting polluted behaviour and culture. This has to change if we are to work on our inner transformation and do inner cleansing, she adds.

As the swachhata hi seva campaign is a tribute to the Father of the Nation, it would be apt to revisit his principles for self-purification. The Mahatma had said, “Identification with everything that lives is impossible without self-purification; without self-purification the observance of the law of Ahimsa must remain an empty dream; God can never be realized by one who is not pure of heart. Self-purification, therefore, must mean purification in all the walks of life. And purification being highly infectious, purification of oneself necessarily leads to the purification of one's surroundings.” (Mahatma Gandhi, My Experiments with Truth)

So, it is only through the process of inner cleansing and self-purification, we can strive to work for the real cleanliness of our surroundings. Let us all take this inherent message across the entire nook and corner of the country.

Towards deplug literacy: An approach for work-life balance and well-being

Australia has recently enacted a law which gives individuals working in different organizations the right to ignore their higher-ups who try to contact them after their work hours. Under the Right to Disconnect, the employees are allowed to neither read nor respond to any official communication beyond their stipulated work hours. While there can be exceptional situations, but the broad idea of the initiative to spare employees from the rigmarole of their official work even after they are finished off for the day’s work is clear. Australia is the not the only country in the world to take up such a bold initiative to protect the personal and family life of employees; there are about a dozen countries both in Europe and South America who have taken up such initiatives.

In the backdrop of this initiative to protect the private space of employees beyond their working hours by Australia and various other countries, a number of individuals reacted on its pros and cons and whether it is really a good idea to log off after one’s working hours.

Dr Oinam Sareeta Devi, Secretary of Kasturba Gandhi Institute of Development feels there is really thin line separating office and home life. She feels the relationship between employer-employee depends on the type of organization one is working – government service, companies and business, civil society organizations or institutions like schools and colleges. According to her the cultural context and type of country one lives is also important. Devi, who also teaches in a local college says it is difficult to divide the official and home time, though she feels the aim should be to strive for proper work-life balance.

“There are times when we have to spend a whole evening at home preparing notes for the class the next day,” she points out, “This accentuates during and after exams. Almost every time I bring answer sheets home for checking, this takes lot of time.” She argues these are work which are superior do not tell; the answer sheets have to be checked by any means and the results have to be announced. It is part of one’s duty and even if one has to burn the midnight oil, it will have to be done, Devi argues.

Notwithstanding the realization of one’s duty and the need to give cent per cent to do it, Devi feels unnecessary meddling in one’s private life after duty hours by the bosses is not a healthy trend. “If the bosses need to discuss something critical, then they have the whole day to discuss. If one gets a call from the boss to discuss official things while one is spending time with one’s family or cooking, it is encroachment in one’s personal space,” she says, “If it is not emergency, and still the boss decides to call up to discuss, it should be called inefficiency. “

While arguing that one-size –fits-all-norms cannot suit all individuals or organizations, Arish, the Director of Naamak Publications is strictly in favour of encouraging work-life balance. He stresses that in ventures like a publishing house which requires constant innovation and creativity from the entire team, if the employees are not fresh, they cannot give their creative best. Arish points out that he is clear about how he encourages his employees to maintain work-life balance and encourages them to rewind every now and then. “I try to be flexible in my approach and engage with my team members according to mutual convenience; there are coercive techniques that are used to extract the maximum out of the employees,” he says.

While initiatives like that of Australia and other countries which have enacted the Right to Disconnect might be difficult in a country like India, Arish feels it should be the responsibility of the employers to help their employees with their work-life balance. He talked about how small businesses and start-ups coerce their employees to work an astounding 12-14 hours a day and give very little holidays. “I can tell you these leads to burn-out, contributes to high turnover rates, and seriously contributes to the quality and efficiency of work,” he underscores, “There is a limit beyond which an individual cannot work, they are after all humans.” “We have to treat all our employees like human beings and respect their dignity,” he quips.

However, before encouraging work-life balance of our employees, we have to start with ourselves, Arish argues. If we are not able to have our own me-time or family time, we will keep on interfering with our employees’ private time, he points out.

Mayank Mathur, an IT expert makes a poignant point in the context of developing economies like India where there are high rates of unemployment and job insecurity. He says in this context, the employees automatically come under the mercy of their employers who can force them to work well beyond their stipulated hours. In this regard, Dr Sareeta Devi observes employers are not at all concerned about the health including mental health of their employees as there are no dearth individuals searching for jobs.

According to Mayank Mathur, both employers and employees need to learn the art and science of effective time management, prioritization and goal-setting so that together they can strive to maintain a healthy balance. He underscores the importance of introducing mindfulness practices in modern day organizations which helps in nourishing the mind, body and spirit of all. Overall, self-care should be given a priority, Mathur argues.

In the backdrop of increasing cases of disengagement between employers and employees due to poor work culture in organizations, Mathur feels there should be transition towards prioritizing experiences, relationships, and personal growth over materialism. As soon as we decide to get into the rat race to double productivity by any means and brow-beat our competitors, we are getting into the realm where we are forced to compromise on the work-life balance both of the employers and the employees, Mathur says.

Complimenting all efforts which helps employees life a healthy and meaningful life, Mayank Mathur argues that given the modern day pressures, deplugging which entails disconnecting from work- related tasks, technology, and responsibilities outside of work hours. Failure to deplug can lead to many modern day lifestyle disease like stress, depression, anxiety disorder, and burnout. In this context, Mathur articulates on the need to be deplug literate wherein an individual develops the critical skills to effectively deplug so that they can improve their mental and physical health. An individual who is deplug literate will designate device-free zones in her/his house; this could be their bedroom or dining space. Further, they will be able to use technology wisely where they can limit their work-related activities outside the working hours. According to Mathur, an important pillar of being deplug literate is the ability and ingenuity to say ‘no’. He feels most of the times individuals in order to enhance their stocks in front of their employers take up more work than they possibly can do productively. In such situations, their efficiency suffers. So, it is important to be mindful of taking up excessive work or responsibilities that can encroach one’s personal time, he adds.

So, while there can be arguments and counter arguments on the right to log off or disconnect, the overarching goal should be to encourage work-life balance which promotes mental and physical health and contributes to genuine happiness and well-being. Mayank Mathur’s concept of deplug literacy can be an important skill to develop in the contemporary times for our overall well-being.

Let not Anger Control Us; let’s Learn to Control it?    (Vedabhyas Kundu)

Riyansh is a middle-aged executive working in a small firm. There is an overload of work, and a toxic work environment. All these environment is having a toll on him, he has become short-tempered and finds it difficult to control his anger even on small things. This is having a direct impact on his health. He suffers from anxiety issues, he is now increasingly having sleeping disorder and many times he suffers from indigestion.

Riyansh is not alone who suffers due to his inability to control anger. Anger, in fact is natural part of our life; it can be described as our natural response to different threats and triggers. It is organic in nature and can be explained as a natural emotion. There can be different triggers which can cause an individual to be angry. For instance, the office environment was the trigger to make Riyansh get angry for even small things.

Life coach and spiritual healer, Anupama Jha points out that primarily the triggers of anger results from lack of mind control which then translates into lack of control over one’s own emotions. She then talks about the detrimental effects of not been able to control one’s mind and emotions as these leads to both physical aggressiveness and mental imbalance. Extreme form of anger can even lead to heart attacks, she warns. Like Riyansh and others who are suffering anger disorder, Anupama Jha points out how such individuals from low life conditions and low life satisfaction. They suffer from low self-esteem, high stress and have difficulties in putting together healthy relationships.

Sohini Jana, who works in the area peace education describes the triggers which fuels anger as of two types- internal and external. Internal triggers are those feelings who according to her which an individual experiences from inside. In this context, Anupama Jha talks about the inner wound which contributes to our consternation. Both Jha and Jana talks about different emotions or situations that an individual is currently going through which makes them angry. In these cases no real external factor is involved. Like for instance, an individual could experience guilt feeling that s/he is not loved by someone with whom s/he may be attached; this can be the cause of their anger. Or there can be a situation when we nurse a feeling of revenge towards someone who might have done some wrong to us.

External triggers are those which results from external factors. Like for instance the toxic environment in Riyansh’s office of his developing a habit of being angry at the slightest instance. When someone tries to harm us physically or mentally, it also makes us angry. Further, habits of alcoholism and substance abuse are also triggers for getting angry. Sohini Jana tells how an individual can get angry when someone do not agree with her/him, s/he is teased or her/his dignity is compromised, when we make a mistake which becomes apparent not only to us but to others, and when we might get ignored.

Constructive management of anger is critical. While anger can be a positive thing if it is managed constructively, it can lead to serious consequences if it remains uncontrolled. Here we can learn from Mahatma Gandhi who said, “It is not that I do not get angry. I don't give vent to anger. I cultivate the quality of patience as angerlessness, and generally speaking, I succeed. But I only control my anger when it comes. How I find it possible to control it would be a useless question, or it is a habit that everyone must cultivate and must succeed in forming by constant practice.” (Mind of Mahatma Gandhi)

So, it should be a matter of constant practice that we learn on how to manage the triggers which causes anger. Anupama Jha underlines the significance of healing our inner wound so that we can cultivate inner peace. She is philosophical as she notes, “Life will keep throwing different difficult situations at us, but if we are unable to learn the art and science of handling such situations, we will keep getting angry which is uncontrolled.” For inner peace, inner healing is critical, she adds. She further notes that as we continue the process of inner healing, we are able to control our mind more constructively.

Anupama Jha also suggests on the importance of living consciously. She feels that individuals should know on how to expand their self-awareness and develop their consciousness on who they are; this will help in handling anger issues effectively. It is also important to learn on how to control our mind and emotions effectively, she stresses.

The first step in managing one’s anger is to recognize and understand the triggers which causes anger, says Sohini Jana. She feels once we start to recognize the triggers at the deepest level, we will be able to overcome the root causes of our anger.

Meanwhile Anupama Jha underlines the effectiveness of mindfulness meditation in handling one’s anger positively. She stresses on the efficacy of practicing mindfulness meditation which evokes a calming effect and regulates our emotions. She talks about different studies which suggests how an individual’s angry outbursts tends to decline when s/he practice mindfulness meditation regularly. In this context, Sohini Jana points out on how mindfulness meditation helps us to remain attentive to the present moment, not let our attention to waiver and keeps us away from those thoughts and ideas which can make us angry. She feels that when we practice mindfulness meditation, we are able to avoid stress and become relaxed.

The author in his different workshops on anger management has been advocating on the need to keep an anger journal as an important strategy. The author recommends that individuals keeping an anger journal while making entries in note books daily use self-introspection to jot down the different points of time of the day when the individual got angry. The author suggests that the anger journal is written while retiring to bed in the night. It is recommended that the individual writes down the triggers of getting angry- who made you angry, what were there reasons, where did you get angry, when did you get angry. Then the individual is encouraged to write on what they were thinking and feeling when they got angry. Further, in the journal, the individual could write what did they do and what they said when they were angry. Finally, the individual is encouraged to write the consequences of their angry behaviour on themselves and on others. Their final observation could be that if they would find themselves in the same situation now, whether there would be some change in their behaviour or attitude.

Mansi Sharma, a mediator and lawyer who researches on nonviolent communication advocates its extensive trainings and assimilation in our daily habits. She feels nonviolent communication helps in the expansion of one’s feeling of human interdependence, contributes in the development of a healthy communication ecosystem and help to respond to difficult situations empathetically. According to her, as nonviolent communication hinges on the foundational architecture of Mahatma Gandhi’s 5-pillars of nonviolence- respect, understanding, acceptance, appreciation and compassion, these helps in handling difficult situations constructively. She underscores how practicing nonviolent communication helps in expansion of one’s self-awareness in the context of triggers that causes anger and one’s self-esteem.

According to Mansi Sharma, when we have assimilated the principles of nonviolent communication in our daily lives, we will be able to recognize the unmet needs of ours and also the unmet needs of others which will help us to respond and react accordingly.

Given the deleterious effects of anger, it is imperative that every individual learn to control their emotions and mind so that anger do not take control of them. To conclude it would be pertinent to quote the Vietnamese Zen Master, Thich Nhat Hanh, who in his book, The Art of Communicating, said, “Anger is often a symptom of underlying pain or fear.” So each one of us need to go deeper and not at the surface level to unearth the inherent root causes of our anger and start the different strategies as discussed in this article to further our emotional healing.